<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Saul Bass left a footprint in Chelsea</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.weatherpattern.com/2008/05/saul-bass-left-a-footprint-in-chelsea/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.weatherpattern.com/2008/05/saul-bass-left-a-footprint-in-chelsea/</link>
	<description>a blog on design / culture / telecom / networks / work / life / online-offline / new york</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 20:23:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: weather pattern &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Ma Bell Redux</title>
		<link>http://www.weatherpattern.com/2008/05/saul-bass-left-a-footprint-in-chelsea/comment-page-1/#comment-269</link>
		<dc:creator>weather pattern &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Ma Bell Redux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 00:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.weatherpattern.com/?p=206#comment-269</guid>
		<description>[...] Update on: Saul Bass left a footprint in Chelsea [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Update on: Saul Bass left a footprint in Chelsea [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Truffles the Pig</title>
		<link>http://www.weatherpattern.com/2008/05/saul-bass-left-a-footprint-in-chelsea/comment-page-1/#comment-239</link>
		<dc:creator>Truffles the Pig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 19:28:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.weatherpattern.com/?p=206#comment-239</guid>
		<description>Not only is the Verizon check mark annoying, but the name itself was likely an infringement on another company&#039;s existing mark: 

http://www.schwimmerlegal.com/2002/08/inverizon_v_ver.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not only is the Verizon check mark annoying, but the name itself was likely an infringement on another company&#8217;s existing mark: </p>
<p><a href="http://www.schwimmerlegal.com/2002/08/inverizon_v_ver.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.schwimmerlegal.com/2002/08/inverizon_v_ver.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

